The Influence of Organizational Commitment and Style Leadership on Managerial Performance Empirical Study at PMI Surakarta City

Santosa Tri Prabawa

Authors

Santosa Tri Prabawa Wijaya Mulya College of Economics, Surakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

Organizational commitment, leadership style, managerial performance

Abstract

Human resources are an important part in achieving organizational goals. Employee activities in achieving organizational goals cannot be separated from the role of leaders in managing their subordinates. Organizational goals can be achieved well if leaders can manage subordinate management activities and carry out management functions, namely: planning, directing, organizing and controlling. In leading, each leader has a different leadership pattern in moving and directing each employee. This pattern can be used by a leader to influence the behavior of others. Each of these patterns has advantages and disadvantages. A leader will generally use a leadership style according to his abilities and personality. A good leader will see and hear every condition of his employees or subordinates. The research population was section heads, section heads and staff in the PMI Surakarta City environment, totaling 103 people. The sample was taken using purposive sampling, namely the sample was taken for a specific purpose, totaling 80 respondents who returned the questionnaire. The section heads, section heads and staff were taken as samples. This research uses primary data. Research results: Obtained t value= 1.971 with a significance of p= 0.382 which is greater or more than the significance level= 0.05, meaning there is no influence between organizational commitment on managerial performance at PMI Surakarta, while the t value = 4.939 with a significance of p= 0.000 which is smaller or less than the significance level = 0.05, then there is an influence between leadership style on managerial performance at PMI Surakarta.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Absah, Y. (2007). Pengaruh Kemampuan Pembelajaran terhadap Kompetensi, Tingkat Diversifikasi, dan Kinerja Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Sumatera Utara, Desertasi.

Amrul, S. S., & Nasir, M. (2002). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Ketidakpastian Lingkungan Terhadap Hubungan antara Partisipasi Pengangga- ran dan Senjangan Anggaran, Simposim Nasional Akuntansi V, Semarang Govindarajan, V. 1986. Impact of Participation in the Budgetary Process on Managerial Attitudes and Performance: Universalistic and Contingency Perspectives. Decision Sciences.

Anthony, R.N., et al. (1989). Management control system. Homewood, II : Irwin.

Basuki, R. (2016). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta Dengan Motivasi Sebagai Pemediasi: 1–15.

Brownell, P. (1983). Leadership Style, Budgetary Participation and Managerial Behavior, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 307 – 321.

Brownell, P., & McInness. (1986). Budgetary Participation, Motivation, and Managerial Performance, The Accounting Review.

DeCoster, T.D., & Fertakis, P.J. (1968). Budget-induced pressure and its relationship to supervisory behavior. Journal of accounting research (Autumn), pp. 237-246.

Chong, V. K., and Chong, K. M. (2002). Budget Goal Commitment and Informational Effect of Budget Participation on Performance: A Structural Aquation Modelling Approach, Behvioral Research in Accounting Journal.

Ghozali, I. (2001). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Govindarajan, V. (1986). Impact of Participation in the Budgetary Process on Managerial Attitudes and Performance: Universalistic and Contingency Perspectives. Decision Sciences.

Gujarati. D. (2003). Ekonometrika Dasar, Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta.

Ikhsan., & Ane. (2006). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran terhadap Senjangan Anggaran denganmenggunakan LimaVariabel Pemoderasi, Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 10 Makasar.

Indriantoro, N. (2000). An Empirical Study of Locus of Control and Cultural Dimensions as Moderating Variables of The Effect of Participative Budgeting on Job Performance and Job Satisfaction, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia, Vol.15, No. 1, 2000, Hal. 97 – 114.

Ivancevic, J. (1976). The Effect of Goal Setting on Perfoermance and Job Satisfaction, Journal of Applied Psychology, pp. 605-612.

Kenis, I. (1979). Effect of budgetary goal characteristics on managerial attitudes and performance. The accounting review, 54, pp. 707-721.

Mahsun, M. (2006). Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik, BPFE Yogyakarta.

Mardiasmo. (2002). Akuntansi Sektor Publik, Penerbit Andi, Yogyakarta.

Mia, L. (1989). The Impact of Participation in Budgeting and Job Difficulty on Managerial Performance and Work Motivation: A Research Note, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 347 – 357.

Milani, K. (1975). The Relationship of Participation in Budget-Setting to Industrial Supervisor Performance and Attitudes : A Field Study, The Accounting Review.

Muslimah, S.(1998). Dampak Gaya Kepemimpinan,Ketidakpastian Lingkungan dan Informasi Job-Relevant terhadap Perceived Usefulness Sistem Penganggaran Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia.

Musyarofah, S. (2003). Pengaruh Penggunaan Anggaran dan gaya Manajemen terhadap Hubungan antara Perubahan Strategik dan Kinerja Organisasi, Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VI, Surabaya.

Nouri, H., & Parker, R. J. (1998). The Relationship Between Budgetary Participation and Job Performance: The Roles of Budget Adequacy and OrganizationalCommitment,Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 23, No. 5/6, pp.467-483

Santoso, S. (2003). SPSS Mengolah Data Statistik Secara Profesional,. PT. elex Media Komputindo. Jakarta.

Sardjito, B., & Osmad, M. (2007). Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Aparat Pemerintah Daerah: Budaya Organisasi dan Komitmen Organisasi sebagai Variabel Moderating. SNA 10 Makasar.

Sekaran, U. (2000). Research Methods for Business, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York.

Siegel, G. & H.K. Marconi. (1989). Behavioral Accounting, South-Western Publishing Co. Cincinnati.

Sumarno,J. (2005). Pengaruh Komitmen Organissi dan Gaya Kepemimpinan terhadap Partisipasi Anggaran dan Kinerja Manajerial (Studi Empiris pada Kantor Cabang Perbankan Indonesia di Jakarta), Simposium Nasional VIII, Solo.

Supriyono, R.A. (2004). Pengaruh Variabel intervening Kecukupan Anggaran dan Komitmenn organisasi terhadap hubungan antara partisipasi anggaran dan kinerja manajer di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia. Vol.19, No. 3.