Main Article Content

Abstract

This research discusses the issue of the influence of internal control on performance accountability. Bureaucracy reform in Indonesia has entered the new round with regulation of the minister of administrative reform and Bureaucratic Reform No. 25 of 2020 on the Road Map of bureaucratic reform in 2020-2025. The research measures how far the readiness of the National Civil Service Agency (BKN) in realizing performance accountability through internal control. The researcha also takes the institutional theory approach of isomorphism and neo-patrimonialism theory as a development of previous research and is a novelty in this research. The sample processed was 99 respondents are APIP (Aparatur pengawas internal pemerintah) in BKN. Data processing using Structure equation Modeling (SEM) with Partial Least Square (PLS) approach. The results of the study are controlling positively on performance accountability. Mimetic and Normative Isomorphism moderate the influence of internal control on performance accountability. coersive isomorphism and Neo-patrimonialism do not moderate the influence of internal control on performance accountability.

Keywords

Internal control; accountability; isomorphism, neo-patrimonialism

Article Details

How to Cite
Sukmajati, A. ., Rohmat, & Edy, Y. J. . (2021). Neo-Patrimonialism and Isomorphism in Moderating the Influence of Internal Control on Performance Accountability (Study at the office of National Civil Service Agency (BKN) in Indonesia). International Journal of Seocology, 2(02), 043–053. https://doi.org/10.29040/seocology.v2i02.20

References

  1. A Glebovskiy. (2019). Criminogenic isomorphism and groupthink in the business context. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 1(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ IJOTB-03-2018-0024
  2. Aprilianti, D., Wulan, M., & Kurniawan, H. (2020). Pengaruh Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran, Pengendalian Internal, dan Sistem Pelaporan Terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintahan di Kecamatan Wilayah Jakarta Selatan (p. 10). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan Volume 9 No 2 Juli 2020. journal.stieputrabangsa.ac.id/index.php/jiak
  3. Ayem, S., & Kusumasari, K. F. (2020). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP) Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud dalam Pengelolaan Dana Desa dengan Akuntabilitas Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Humanika, 10(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiah.v10i2.25827
  4. Draft, P. E. (2013). Communittee of Sponsoring Organization of The Threadway Commisiion (COSO). Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission C, 178. www.ic.coso.org
  5. Fitrawati dkk. (2017). Pengaruh Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran dan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintahan (Survei Pada Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah (SKPD) Kabupaten Parigi Moutong). E Jurnal Katalogis, 5(12), 1–8.
  6. Frumkin, P., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2004). Institutional isomorphism and public sector organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh028
  7. Goddard, A. (2020). Accountability and accounting in the NGO field comprising the UK and Africa – A Bordieusian analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, xxxx, 102200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2020.102200
  8. Grossi, G., Kallio, K.-M., Sargiacomo, M., & Skoog, M. (2019). Accounting, performance management systems and accountability changes in knowledge-intensive public organizations: A literature review and research agenda. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(1), 256–280. https://doi.org/DOI: ,
  9. Hanafi, A. sukma, & Harsono, M. (2016). Jurnal Informasi dan Komunikasi Administrasi Perkantoran. Jurnal Informasi Dan Komunikasi Administrasi Perkantoran E-ISSN 2614-0349, 4(3), 1–6. http://jurnal.uns.ac.id/JIKAP%0APELAKSANAAN
  10. T. F. Efendi and M. Sidiq, “Analysis of Sales System Implementation in Primary Koperasi Tribuana II,” vol. 01, no. 03, pp. 3–6, 2020.
  11. Haning, M. T. (2018). Reformasi Birokrasi di Indonesia: Tinjauan Dari Perspektif Administrasi Publik. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Dan Pelayanan Publik, 4(1), 25–37. journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jakpp
  12. Henk, O. (2020). Internal control through the lens of institutional work: a systematic literature review. In Journal of Management Control (Vol. 31, Issue 3). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00301-4
  13. Hopper, T. (2017). Neopatrimonialism, good governance, corruption and accounting in Africa. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 7(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-12-2015-0086
  14. Ilias, N., Abdulatiff, N. K., & Mohamed, N. (2016). Management control system and performance: Accountability attributes in local authorities. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(4), 26–35.
  15. Kawatu, F. S., & Kewo, C. L. (2019). the Factors Influencing Managerial Performance and Their Effect on Financial Accountability. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 9(5), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.8551
  16. Manullang, S. B., & Abdullah, S. (2019). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal, Kejelasan Anggaran dan Pergantian Kepala SKPD terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA), 4(1), 62–73. http://www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/EKA/article/view/8764
  17. Ningtyas, H. I. R., Roekhudin, & Andayani, W. (2019). The Effect of Government Internal Control System and Government Accounting System on Performance Accountability With The Financial Quality Statements As Intervening Variables (Case Study: The Government of Lumajang Regency, East Java). International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 18(5), 179–187.
  18. Nofianti, L., & Suseno, N. S. (2014). Factors Affecting Implementation of Good Government Governance (GGG) and their Implications towards Performance Accountability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164(August), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.056
  19. Orakcı, Ş., Dilekli, Y., & Erdağ, C. (2020). The structural relationship between accountability felt and responsible teaching in Turkish teachers: The mediating effect of innovative thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36(April), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100662
  20. Paul J. DiMaggio, & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Association, Vol. 48, N(2), 147-160 (14 pages). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  21. Schantl, S. F., & Wagenhofer, A. (2020). Optimal internal control regulation: Standards, penalties, and leniency in enforcement. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, xxxx, 106803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106803
  22. Scobie, M., Lee, B., & Smyth, S. (2020). Grounded accountability and Indigenous self-determination. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, xxxx, 102198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2020.102198
  23. Shkel, S. N. (2019). Neo-patrimonial practices and sustainability of authoritarian regimes in Eurasia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 52(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2019.04.002
  24. Soest, C. von. (2014). What Neopatrimonialism Is - Six Questions to the Concept What Neopatrimonialism Is – Six Questions to the Concept Christian von Soest Paper to be presented at the workshop “ Neopatrimonialism in Various World Regions ” 23 August 2010 , GIGA German Institu. GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, January 2010.
  25. Suharyanto, A. R. Y., . S., Mahullete, Y., Meiria, E., & . S. (2018). Internal Control and Accountability of Local Government Performance in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 3(8), 538. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i8.2531
  26. Sun, L., Ji, S., & Ye, J. (2018). Partial Least Squares. In Multi-Label Dimensionality Reduction. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16017-6
  27. T. F. Efendi, “Pengembangan Website Smk Negeri 3 Sukoharjo,” Semin. Nas. Sist. Inf., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 957–964, 2017.
  28. D. Muliasari, “TYPES OF READING QUESTION ANALYSIS IN ELECTRONIC SCHOOL BOOK ‘BAHASA INGGRIS’ FOR THE TWELVE GRADE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL,” vol. 01, no. 04, pp. 450–463, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/60156551/reading_question_analysis20190730-42695-1t1d85r.pdf?1564474914=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DTYPES_OF_READING_QUESTION_ANALYSIS_IN_EL.pdf&Expires=1594628465&Signature=Of0GJwv~iGtIYxTCD9fC.
  29. T. F. Efendi, R. Rahmadi, and Y. Prayudi, “Rancang Bangun Sistem Untuk Manajemen Barang Bukti Fisik dan Chain of Custody (CoC) pada Penyimpananan Laboratorium Forensika Digital,” J. Teknol. dan Manaj. Inform., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 53–63, 2020, doi: 10.26905/jtmi.v6i2.4177.
  30. D. Thoi’in, Muhammad; Muliasari, “ANALYSIS OF WORK SATISFACTION, ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS, AND WORK ENGAGEMENT EFFFECT TOWARD EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE IN SHARIA BANKS,” vol. 2020, no. 2, pp. 161–170, 2020.
  31. D. Muliasari, “THE EFFECT OF PRODUCT PRICE AND PRODUCT QUALITY ON PURCHASING DECISIONS FOR SAMSUNG BRAND HANDPHONES AMONG STIE AAS SURAKARTA STUDENTS,” vol. 2019, no. 4, pp. 501–506, 2019.
  32. T. F. Efendi, “The Management of Physical Evidence and Chain of Custody (CoC) in Digital Forensic Laboratory Storage,” Int. J. Seocology, vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 001–010, 2019, doi: 10.29040/seocology.v1i01.3.